Tennis legend Dominic Thiem's blunt advice for young players has sparked a debate in the tennis world. But is he right?
The former tennis star, who dominated the court alongside the 'big three', has a remarkable 17 tour-level titles under his belt, including the prestigious US Open. His 2020 victory at Flushing Meadows, where he came back from a two-set deficit against Alexander Zverev, is a testament to his prowess.
However, Thiem's recent comments about the one-handed backhand have caught everyone's attention. He believes that the shot, which brought him success, is becoming a rarity in the sport.
In a candid interview, Thiem revealed, "I wouldn't suggest a young player switch to a one-handed backhand." He explained that with the increasing pace of the game, a two-handed backhand offers more stability and a slight advantage in lengthy rallies. This is a bold statement from a player who mastered the one-handed backhand.
But here's where it gets controversial. Thiem acknowledges the exceptional talent of players like Lorenzo Musetti, who excel with the one-handed backhand and its variations. Yet, he predicts that the shot's popularity will continue to decline, potentially leaving the tennis world without a one-handed backhand Grand Slam champion for years.
Thiem's words carry weight, but they also raise questions. Is the one-handed backhand truly a dying art? Can players like Musetti defy the odds and bring it back to glory? Or is Thiem's advice a pragmatic approach to the evolving nature of the game?
The debate is open! Share your thoughts on whether the one-handed backhand has a future in tennis and if Thiem's advice is on point. Let's discuss!
